On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > ?I vote to have one library -lpetsc and one include file petsc.h > > ? Barry > > Only partially joking >
Well, having a single include, even if it is not called "petsc.h", would be really nice. > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > >> Should we default to using --with-single-library=1? [I'd prefer this - >> as it will minimize dlopen issues from external packages.] >> >> Also - I'd like to have distinct library names between >> --with-single-library=0 and 1 - so that there is no ambiguity. >> >> i.e libpetsc.a for --with-single-library=1 >> libpetscsys.a [instead of current libpetsc.a] for --with-single-library=0 >> >> With this change, the 'shared' targets don't have to be overloaded for >> libpetsc.so [for eg: for shared_darwin] >> >> Satish >> > > -- Lisandro Dalc?n --------------- Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
