On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Lisandro Dalc?n wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > ?I vote to have one library -lpetsc and one include file petsc.h > > > > ? Barry > > > > Only partially joking > > > > Well, having a single include, even if it is not called "petsc.h", > would be really nice.
We don't have to merge all includes into a single file. Just have petscall.h [currently in fortran] available for users to specify [a single include] in user code would be sufficient. [and rename petscall.h to petsc.h] Satish
