On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Lisandro Dalc?n wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> >
>> > ?I vote to have one library -lpetsc and one include file petsc.h
>> >
>> > ? Barry
>> >
>> > Only partially joking
>> >
>>
>> Well, having a single include, even if it is not called "petsc.h",
>> would be really nice.
>
> We don't have to merge all includes into a single file. Just have
> petscall.h [currently in fortran] available for users to specify [a
> single include] in user code would be sufficient.
>

That's what I meant.





-- 
Lisandro Dalc?n
---------------
Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC)
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET)
PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594

Reply via email to