For now - I'm pusing the 2 changes I proposed. Satish
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Barry Smith wrote: > > I vote to have one library -lpetsc and one include file petsc.h > > Barry > > Only partially joking > > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > > > Should we default to using --with-single-library=1? [I'd prefer this - > > as it will minimize dlopen issues from external packages.] > > > > Also - I'd like to have distinct library names between > > --with-single-library=0 and 1 - so that there is no ambiguity. > > > > i.e libpetsc.a for --with-single-library=1 > > libpetscsys.a [instead of current libpetsc.a] for --with-single-library=0 > > > > With this change, the 'shared' targets don't have to be overloaded for > > libpetsc.so [for eg: for shared_darwin] > > > > Satish > > >
