On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> This is what I do for myself [with pine] > Yeah, the problem is that some sending servers only allow you to set specific reply-to addresses. The biggest concern is gmail which only allows one person in all of gmail to have added petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov as "one of their accounts". That person is Matt, so he sends mail as "Matt Knepley < petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov>". > > > Alternative would be for petsc-maint to remove the user's email from > > reply-to when it delivers to us, then match message headers so that our > > replies which go only to petsc-maint would be forwarded to the original > > reporter. Seems very fragile. > > I agree it can be fragile. > > For one - I'll have to check with systems if rt can be configured this > way. Also it would mean sender's info won't be in the header [so > where would it be?] What about 'cc:' list from sender? [we would wan't > rt to strip this out aswell - and send e-mails to the cc:list > automaticaly from our replies]. And then there will be no more private > messages [between us] on petsc-maint :) > I think it's too dangerous at this point. We had discussions earlier about an email-integrated issue tracker, at which point this would be feasible. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120719/f4ba791e/attachment-0001.html>
