On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Jed Brown wrote: > >>>> This is what I do for myself [with pine] >>> >>> Doesn't solve the problem because the user still has in their header >>> the developers email address. >>> > > For one - my replies [with pine] don't have that. Secondly - even if > the developers email address is there - it shouldn't matter. We are > primarily concerned with users using 'reply' command from their e-mail > client. And it will honor 'reply-to:petsc-maint'. > > If the user is explicitly manipulating headers by other means - we > can't [and shouldn't] be attempting to control that.
WRONG > > Satish > >> This is something that a developer using certain hosts can do to make the >> issue moot, not something that involves the user.
