On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I do not understand this. If the user knows your email address they > can still send you email. You are telling me you can send me an email that > does not contain your email address somewhere in the header? > > yes reply-to is a good start but it is not a finish. People by-pass > that. > That would be good enough because they'd have to edit their headers to do something else. > This is easy. The not-be-named developer simply modifies the subject > line in any way. The match doesn't work so the message does not go back to > the user > Yup, just possibly unintuitive that the ticket number has to be removed to make a private reply. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120719/24cf6336/attachment.html>
