On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 21:55 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 20:06 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > > On 8 July 2011 19:46, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 23:24 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > > >> On 7 July 2011 23:20, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > >> > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:59 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > > [...] > > > And that should be all. The fixed patch is attached. There is one > > > remaining issue: how to refresh the object's parent node in the new > > > schema? > > > > I played around with rebuilding the node path with the new schema name > > to refresh it, but I kept getting endless data type issues, and have > > no idea how this node stuff works, so I'm not sure what to do about > > that. Have any guidance? If not, I might have another attempt at > > working out how to manipulate nodes. > > > > I'll try to look into this, but I don't think I'll be lucky. >
I was wrong. I have it working. Code is ugly right now, so it'll need some cleanup/refactoring/etc. Should be able to commit it tomorrow :) -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
