On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 13:39 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > > I would prefer to only refresh the old parent node, and the new parent > > node. But we have no way to know the new parent node. So I refresh all > > schemas. Which will bring other performance issues for users with big > > schemas. > > I wonder if we need to think about a way of passing more info down to > the lower guts of the execution mechanism. We kinda did that already > when we added the 2 part SQL execution, maybe now we should think > about a more extensible technique (maybe as simple as passing a simple > struct of stuff to deal with). >
Do you have an example? I'm not sure I really understand what you mean. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
