On 9 July 2011 00:12, Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 21:55 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 20:06 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: >> > On 8 July 2011 19:46, Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 23:24 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: >> > >> On 7 July 2011 23:20, Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:59 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: >> > [...] >> > > And that should be all. The fixed patch is attached. There is one >> > > remaining issue: how to refresh the object's parent node in the new >> > > schema? >> > >> > I played around with rebuilding the node path with the new schema name >> > to refresh it, but I kept getting endless data type issues, and have >> > no idea how this node stuff works, so I'm not sure what to do about >> > that. Have any guidance? If not, I might have another attempt at >> > working out how to manipulate nodes. >> > >> >> I'll try to look into this, but I don't think I'll be lucky. >> > > I was wrong. I have it working. Code is ugly right now, so it'll need > some cleanup/refactoring/etc. Should be able to commit it tomorrow :)
Excellent. I'll be interested to see what you needed to do to achieve it. Merci beaucoup. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
