On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote:
> I would prefer to only refresh the old parent node, and the new parent > node. But we have no way to know the new parent node. So I refresh all > schemas. Which will bring other performance issues for users with big > schemas. I wonder if we need to think about a way of passing more info down to the lower guts of the execution mechanism. We kinda did that already when we added the 2 part SQL execution, maybe now we should think about a more extensible technique (maybe as simple as passing a simple struct of stuff to deal with). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
