On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:10, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22 September 2010 15:07, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes: >>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing >>>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning >>>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching. >>> >>>> Agreed. >>> >>>> What about the messages in configure? >>>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL >>>> from CVS nor" >>> >>> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but >>> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch. >> >> Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I >> somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a >> different version :-) >> >> I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so >> I'll go look at backporting it soon. > > I don't see any mention of redirecting the Heap-Only Tuples glossary > reference link. Is that staying as it is?
Ah, good point. No, let's change that. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
