On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing >>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning >>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching. > >> Agreed. > >> What about the messages in configure? >> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL >> from CVS nor" > > I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but > if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a different version :-) I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so I'll go look at backporting it soon. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
