On 22 September 2010 15:07, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes: >>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing >>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning >>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching. >> >>> Agreed. >> >>> What about the messages in configure? >>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL >>> from CVS nor" >> >> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but >> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch. > > Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I > somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a > different version :-) > > I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so > I'll go look at backporting it soon.
I don't see any mention of redirecting the Heap-Only Tuples glossary reference link. Is that staying as it is? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
