2014/1/13 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:10:24AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I find the rules above so complex that I don't see how we can > recommend > > a best syntax. What I did in the patch I just posted was to put the > > preferred operator first, but I don't see why we want to get into > these > > details in the docs. > > > > > > just a note about preferred variant should be ok. Using ':=' in GET > DIAGNOSTICS > > statement is just bad idea. > > Agreed. I added a sentence in the first mention of GET DIAGNOSTICS, and > indicated it was generic for that command. What I also added was your > description of when to use := and =, but I put it in the C comments so > we have a record of it and if we need to expand the description or > behavior later. >
I'll be more happy if a comment about GET DIAGNOSTICS statement will be in user space. Regards Pavel > > -- > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + Everyone has their own god. + >
