2014/1/15 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:07:29AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I thought you would say that. :-) I don't see how this detail makes > > sense in the sections related to the syntax usage, so I looked in the > > section Porting from Oracle PL/SQL, and I don't see how it fits there > > either. > > > > > > > > :) > > > > just notice - sorry for my English > > > > ==Assign== > > Using ":=" is preffered as assign statement due conformity with ADA > language (a > > plpgsql ancestor). > > > > > > ==GET DIAGNOSTICS== > > > > Using "=" is highly preferred due conformity with ANSI/SQL > > The problem is that these are philosophical issues that are not normally > covered in our docs. What I have done is to add a mention of which > option is compliant to the new text. Patch attached. > > Is GET DIAGNOSTICS defined in the standard for SQL/PSM only or for > generic SQL? > > I found this statement in ANSI SQL 92 - and few minutes searching - it is in generic SQL - today "SQL framework" part and it is enhanced in "SQL/PSM"
Regards Pavel > -- > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + Everyone has their own god. + >
