2014/1/15 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > > > > 2014/1/15 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> > >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:07:29AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> > I thought you would say that. :-) I don't see how this detail >> makes >> > sense in the sections related to the syntax usage, so I looked in >> the >> > section Porting from Oracle PL/SQL, and I don't see how it fits >> there >> > either. >> > >> > >> > >> > :) >> > >> > just notice - sorry for my English >> > >> > ==Assign== >> > Using ":=" is preffered as assign statement due conformity with ADA >> language (a >> > plpgsql ancestor). >> > >> > >> > ==GET DIAGNOSTICS== >> > >> > Using "=" is highly preferred due conformity with ANSI/SQL >> >> The problem is that these are philosophical issues that are not normally >> covered in our docs. What I have done is to add a mention of which >> option is compliant to the new text. Patch attached. >> >> Is GET DIAGNOSTICS defined in the standard for SQL/PSM only or for >> generic SQL? >> >> > I found this statement in ANSI SQL 92 - and few minutes searching - it is > in generic SQL - today "SQL framework" part and it is enhanced in "SQL/PSM" >
sorry s/SQL framework/SQL Foundation/ Regards Pavel > > Regards > > Pavel > > >> -- >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us >> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com >> >> + Everyone has their own god. + >> > >
