Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> I went with "Allowed, but not in PG" for those two fields, and
> removed the extra rows I had added. You can see the output here:
>
> http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html
Looks great!
The only suggestion I can think to make to the table itself is to
make the new column header singular, to match the other columns.
I do think we should define the term used in the new column header;
maybe something like this:
serialization anomaly
The result of successfully committing a group of transactions
is inconsistent with all possible orderings of running those
transactions one at a time.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
