On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:08:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 02:15:20PM +0000, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > > I went with "Allowed, but not in PG" for those two fields, and > > > removed the extra rows I had added. You can see the output here: > > > > > > http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html > > > > > > Looks great! > > > > The only suggestion I can think to make to the table itself is to > > make the new column header singular, to match the other columns. > > I do think we should define the term used in the new column header; > > maybe something like this: > > > > > > serialization anomaly > > > > The result of successfully committing a group of transactions > > is inconsistent with all possible orderings of running those > > transactions one at a time. > > OK, output updated: > > http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html
Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
