On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 02:15:20PM +0000, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> > I went with "Allowed, but not in PG" for those two fields, and
> > removed the extra rows I had added. You can see the output here:
> >
> > http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html
>
>
> Looks great!
>
> The only suggestion I can think to make to the table itself is to
> make the new column header singular, to match the other columns.
> I do think we should define the term used in the new column header;
> maybe something like this:
>
>
> serialization anomaly
>
> The result of successfully committing a group of transactions
> is inconsistent with all possible orderings of running those
> transactions one at a time.
OK, output updated:
http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
