Would this be a relatively easy patch for a beginning contributor? If so, I wouldn't mind having a go.
/Colin On 9 August 2017 at 21:37, Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:32 PM, David G. Johnston < > david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> *>I'm am wondering whether "REASSIGNED OWNED" **needs fixing as well* >>> >>> *Possibly, but as the op is on 9.3, it is not available to him.* >>> >> >> You should check the docs again... >> >> >>> *I would also argue that since* *"OWNER TO new_owner" is available in >>> all other ALTER object statements, it is an omission and should be* >>> *included for extenstions as well..* >>> >> >> As am I, but omission or not I don't recall that we've ever back-patched >> new SQL grammar. >> >> David J. >> >> > *>You should check the docs again...* > > *Yes, you are correct, it is in 9.3* > > *>I don't recall that we've ever back-patched new SQL grammar.* > > *I am not saying back patch, I am saying an enhancement for version 10 or > 11.* > > -- > *Melvin Davidson* > I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you > wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you. >
