On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:32 PM, David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> *>I'm am wondering whether "REASSIGNED OWNED" **needs fixing as well* >> >> *Possibly, but as the op is on 9.3, it is not available to him.* >> > > You should check the docs again... > > >> *I would also argue that since* *"OWNER TO new_owner" is available in >> all other ALTER object statements, it is an omission and should be* >> *included for extenstions as well..* >> > > As am I, but omission or not I don't recall that we've ever back-patched > new SQL grammar. > > David J. > > *>You should check the docs again...* *Yes, you are correct, it is in 9.3* *>I don't recall that we've ever back-patched new SQL grammar.* *I am not saying back patch, I am saying an enhancement for version 10 or 11.* -- *Melvin Davidson* I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
