Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:49:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Okay, this is still an open item. Are there any objections to the
>> previous patch applied on master and the addition of the following
>> undefined flags to pg_config.h.win32 for back-branches? Here is the
>> list of flags which I think should be added but disabled for consistency
>> with the rest and compatibility with OpenSSL 1.1.0:
>> HAVE_ASN1_STRING_GET0_DATA
>> HAVE_BIO_GET_DATA
>> HAVE_BIO_METH_NEW
>> HAVE_OPENSSL_INIT_SSL
> Looks OK.
If we're just leaving them undefined, isn't this purely cosmetic?
At least, that was what I understood to be the reasoning for leaving
such symbols out of pg_config.h.win32 in the past.
I'm on board with making things more consistent in HEAD, but not sure
I see any need for back-patching.
regards, tom lane
