Hi, Patch v22-0001 LGTM apart from the following nitpicks

======
src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml

nitpick - /one needs to/you need to/

======
src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c

CheckAlterSubOption:
nitpick = "ideally we could have..." doesn't make sense because the
code uses a more consistent/simpler way. So other option was not ideal
after all.

AlterSubscription
nitpick - typo /syncronization/synchronization/
nipick - plural fix

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml 
b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml
index cbba1ee..6af6d0d 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_subscription.sgml
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ ALTER SUBSCRIPTION <replaceable 
class="parameter">name</replaceable> RENAME TO <
       logical replication worker corresponding to a particular subscription 
have
       the following pattern: <quote><literal>pg_gid_%u_%u</literal></quote>
       (parameters: subscription <parameter>oid</parameter>, remote transaction 
id <parameter>xid</parameter>).
-      To resolve such transactions manually, one needs to roll back all
+      To resolve such transactions manually, you need to roll back all
       the prepared transactions with corresponding subscription IDs in their
       names. Applications can check
       <link 
linkend="view-pg-prepared-xacts"><structname>pg_prepared_xacts</structname></link>
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c 
b/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c
index 27560f1..b21f5c0 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c
@@ -1090,9 +1090,9 @@ CheckAlterSubOption(Subscription *sub, const char *option,
         * publisher cannot be modified if the slot is currently acquired by the
         * existing walsender.
         *
-        * Note that the two_phase is enabled (aka changed from 'false' to 
'true')
-        * on the publisher by the existing walsender so, ideally, we can allow
-        * that even when a subscription is enabled. But we kept this 
restriction
+        * Note that two_phase is enabled (aka changed from 'false' to 'true')
+        * on the publisher by the existing walsender, so we could have allowed
+        * that even when the subscription is enabled. But we kept this 
restriction
         * for the sake of consistency and simplicity.
         */
        if (sub->enabled)
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ AlterSubscription(ParseState *pstate, 
AlterSubscriptionStmt *stmt,
                                         * We need to update both the slot and 
the subscription
                                         * for two_phase option. We can enable 
the two_phase
                                         * option for a slot only once the 
initial data
-                                        * syncronization is done. This is to 
avoid missing some
+                                        * synchronization is done. This is to 
avoid missing some
                                         * data as explained in comments atop 
worker.c.
                                         */
                                        update_two_phase = !opts.twophase;
@@ -1306,9 +1306,9 @@ AlterSubscription(ParseState *pstate, 
AlterSubscriptionStmt *stmt,
                                         *
                                         * Ensure workers have already been 
exited to avoid
                                         * getting prepared transactions while 
we are disabling
-                                        * two_phase option. Otherwise, the 
changes of already
-                                        * prepared transactions can be 
replicated again along
-                                        * with its corresponding commit 
leading to duplicate data
+                                        * two_phase option. Otherwise, the 
changes of an already
+                                        * prepared transaction can be 
replicated again along
+                                        * with its corresponding commit, 
leading to duplicate data
                                         * or errors.
                                         */
                                        if (logicalrep_workers_find(subid, 
true, true))

Reply via email to