> That did cross my mind, but while "enabled" feels more natural grammatically, > "enable" corresponds to the "ENABLE" clause which is to be emitted (or > omitted). > Except when it's "DISABLE"... I can't think of any better phrasing > which is reasonably > short and conveys the meaning "emit the clause which indicates the trigger is > to > be disabled or enabled, and if the latter in what context".
Yeah, I agree with this reasoning, I wasn't even sure to mention this or not. I only did because the ALTER EVENT TRIGGER documentation also mentions "disabled", so there's some precedent of using that form. Keeping it "enable" is fine with me.
