> > I can see the lack of normalization for the LSN as a bug, but the > option patterns in a WITH clause is IMO more debatable. I think that > we should collect more data from the field before setting down on a > behavior we may regret. I can partially get behind a normalization of > the timeout, but I am less clear about the MODE and NO_THROW, as it > could be useful to split them.
IMO, LSN and timeout are both the minimum we should normalize here. I am also not sure how tools will use this feature, but what makes timeout safe IMO is the fact that the "timeout" values across many executions that collapse into a single entry can be understood by the *_exec_time fields. -- Sami
