On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 09:56:29PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> IMO, LSN and timeout are both the minimum we should normalize here.
> 
> I am also not sure how tools will use this feature, but what makes timeout
> safe IMO is the fact that the "timeout" values across many executions that
> collapse into a single entry can be understood by the  *_exec_time fields.

I see the traction here, but I cannot really get fully convinced by a
grouping of the timeouts without more input.  As a whole, I think that
Sirisha's patch is fine enough on its own.

Adding Nathan with his RMT hat on for comments regarding a potential
backpatch to v19, so as we have a fixed query ID with v20.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to