> > I see the traction here, but I cannot really get fully convinced by a > grouping of the timeouts without more input. As a whole, I think that > Sirisha's patch is fine enough on its own. >
Perhaps LSN is enough for now as it will be the value that will vary the most with heavy usage. I don't know how often TIMEOUT values will vary however, so I'll drop the options normalization idea for now. -- Sami
