Hi Tatsuo,

> So my plan for v52 is, using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY
> for "pattern" as below. Does this work for you?

Yes, I think that works.

Another way is to have the Assert read winstate->rpPattern in place
of the local:

  Assert(elem->next >= 0 &&
         elem->next < winstate->rpPattern->numElements);

Either is fine.  2013 in the increment removes the local, so the two
end up at the same place.

Best regards,
Henson

Reply via email to