Hi Tatsuo, > So my plan for v52 is, using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY > for "pattern" as below. Does this work for you?
Yes, I think that works.
Another way is to have the Assert read winstate->rpPattern in place
of the local:
Assert(elem->next >= 0 &&
elem->next < winstate->rpPattern->numElements);
Either is fine. 2013 in the increment removes the local, so the two
end up at the same place.
Best regards,
Henson
