Hi Henson, > Hi Tatsuo, > >> So my plan for v52 is, using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY >> for "pattern" as below. Does this work for you? > > Yes, I think that works. > > Another way is to have the Assert read winstate->rpPattern in place > of the local: > > Assert(elem->next >= 0 && > elem->next < winstate->rpPattern->numElements); > > Either is fine. 2013 in the increment removes the local, so the two > end up at the same place.
Thanks for confirmation. I will go for PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY. Regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
