The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, IMHO, the pro to moving to libedit is that we could include it > as part of the distribution and make history a *standard* feature How big is libedit? If it's tiny, that might be a good argument ... but I don't want to see us bulking up our distro with something that people could and should get directly from its source. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Adam Haberlach
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Adam Haberlach
- [HACKERS] Re: GNU readline and BSD license mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Bierman
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche