On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I've removed the statement for now, since it was being used incorrectly > anyway, but for the future I suggest that NetBSD catch up, if it wants to > stay compatible. Thank you, and Jaromir tells me he'll commit a fix to NetBSD within days! Happy New Year, Patrick
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- NetBSD libedit (Re: [HACKERS] GNU readl... Patrick Welche
- NetBSD libedit (Re: [HACKERS] GNU readl... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein