* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001229 16:38] wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Actually, IMHO, the pro to moving to libedit is that we could include it > > as part of the distribution and make history a *standard* feature > > How big is libedit? If it's tiny, that might be a good argument ... > but I don't want to see us bulking up our distro with something that > people could and should get directly from its source. ~350k -- -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Adam Haberlach
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Adam Haberlach
- [HACKERS] Re: GNU readline and BSD license mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Bierman
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Patrick Welche
- NetBSD libedit (Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD licen... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Bruce Momjian