On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > Actually, IMHO, the pro to moving to libedit is that we could include it > > as part of the distribution and make history a *standard* feature > > History already is a standard feature, you just need to have readline > installed. So, history is optional depending on whether or not readline is installed ... if it was standard, it would be enabled regardless of any other dependencies ...
- [HACKERS] Re: GNU readline and BSD lice... mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Bierman
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- NetBSD libedit (Re: [HACKERS] GNU readl... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson