> Anyways - I only somewhat disagree. I remember the original discussions, and > I remember agreeing with the points to keep PostgreSQL UUID support thin and > rigid. It's valuable for it to be built-in to the database. It's not > necessarily valuable for PostgreSQL to support every UUID version or every > format. Supporting additional formats is the direction of supporting every > UUID format. Three months from now, somebody is going to propose allowing > '-' or ':'. What should the answer be then?
Beats me. I didn't make the TODO list, I'm just coding to it. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
