On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:18 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that > using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to > support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that.
I am not sure I agree with this. Someone submits patch ticket is created reviewer takes ticket comments submitter takes ticket fixes based on comments review takes ticket approves if reviewer is a committers, he commits. if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to "need final review" tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters. Sounds like standard stuff to me. Joshua D. Drake > > --Josh > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
