Greg Stark wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > >> - "Previously EXPLAIN VERBOSE output an internal representation of the > >> query plan" -> s/output/outputs/ ? > > > > The existing wording seems correct. > > I think Bruce's phrasing was in the past tense. It's a bit weird > because the verb form of "output" is a relatively recent invention and > the past tense isn't well settled. Dictionaries list both "outputted" > and "output" as past tense forms. Personally I think Bruce's "output" > sounds better than the alternative "outputted". > > Perhaps "had output" would be clearer?
Excellent idea; done. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
