Itagaki Takahiro <[email protected]> writes:
> BTW, why the function was named pg_stat_*user*_functions ?
> even though there are no 'all' and 'sys' versions.
Well, it ignores built-in functions. Naming the view that way seems
like good future-proofing to me --- maybe someday we'll think of a
sufficiently low-overhead way to offer stats for system functions too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
