Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I don't have time to look right now, but ISTM the original discussion >> that led to making that patch had ideas about scenarios where it would >> be faster.
> This is what I've been able to find on a quick look: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00678.php > Sounds like Kevin may want to try renaming some of his indices to > produce intermingling... Also, the followup to that message points out that the 8.4.0 code has a potential O(N^2) dependency on the total number of TOC items in the dump. So it might be interesting to check the behavior with very large numbers of tables/indexes. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
