On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> The other possibility here is that this just doesn't work. :-) > > That's why we wanted to test it ;-). > > I don't have time to look right now, but ISTM the original discussion > that led to making that patch had ideas about scenarios where it would > be faster. It'd be worth digging that up and seeing if the current > tests covered the case or not.
This is what I've been able to find on a quick look: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00678.php Sounds like Kevin may want to try renaming some of his indices to produce intermingling... ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
