"Kevin Grittner" <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Also, the followup to that message points out that the 8.4.0 code
>> has a potential O(N^2) dependency on the total number of TOC items
>> in the dump. So it might be interesting to check the behavior with
>> very large numbers of tables/indexes.
> I've got 431 user tables with 578 indexes. How high should I push
> this? Can I just create a bunch of randomly named empty tables with
> primary keys to provoke this effect?
Yeah, just add a bunch of empty tables. Ten thousand or so, perhaps.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
