On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think you should have users/kgrittner/postgres.git rather than >> serializable.git. serializable sounds more like the branch name. > > Hmmm.... On a multi-year project it seemed more than remotely > possible that responsibility for the project could shift, either to > an external contractor or some other programmer here, so a name > related to the reason for the repository rather than the current > lead programmer seemed to make sense. One wouldn't want the > repository location shifting based on assignments, I would have > thought. But if that's going to throw people, I can easily withdraw > my original request and resubmit along the lines you mention. I'll > wait a bit for other comments before taking any action.
Well the nice thing about git is that there is no reason why you need to have a single central repository... ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
