"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
>>> So add me to the list of people who think that if
>>> these are going to be recurring, we should look at moving from
>>> cvs to git as soon as 9.0 is released.
>>
>> The gating factor is not release schedule; it is the still-
>> unaddressed tasks that must be done before we can consider moving.
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Switching_PostgreSQL_from_CVS_to_Git
> If you think people can work on that list without risk of delaying
> the release, OK. I was assuming that such work would be too
> disruptive to work on at this point in a release cycle, and might
> possibly pull time from folks who would otherwise be working on the
> release. Do you disagree?
Oh, if you meant that people should start dealing with those tasks after
release, that's fine with me. I read your comment to be that we should
schedule the move for immediately after release, prerequisites or no.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
