On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Aidan Van Dyk <ai...@highrise.ca> wrote: > Yup. And I'm OK with that. In my case, it would be much better to > have a few quick failures, which can complete automatically a few > seconds later then to have a big buildup of transactions to re-verify > by hand upon starting manual processing.
Why would you need to do that? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
