On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 14:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 20:33 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: > >> \d table now only shows that there's a FOREIGN KEY, which might lead the > >> user to think that there should not be any values that don't exist in > >> the referenced table. > > > Neither \d nor \di shows invalid indexes. > > Even if that were true, it's a poor analogy, since a disabled foreign > key has visible *semantic* impact, whereas a disabled index doesn't.
Sure. My agreement to add something appears to have crossed with your comments. I'd appreciate you reviewing the parser aspects of the patch. $TITLE no longer reflects the syntax. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
