Marko Tiikkaja <> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way?  OK with me, but the submitted docs
>> are woefully inadequate on the point.  This behavior is going to have to
>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>> about it :-().

> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is 
> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the 
> patch is not going to be in 9.1.  Does this sound acceptable?

I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
seems far short of being committable is the documentation.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to