Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Oh, did we decide to do it that way? OK with me, but the submitted docs >> are woefully inadequate on the point. This behavior is going to have to >> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports >> about it :-().
> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is > going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the > patch is not going to be in 9.1. Does this sound acceptable? I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that seems far short of being committable is the documentation. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers