Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way? OK with me, but the submitted docs
>> are woefully inadequate on the point. This behavior is going to have to
>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>> about it :-().
> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is
> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the
> patch is not going to be in 9.1. Does this sound acceptable?
I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
seems far short of being committable is the documentation.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
