On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
>> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way?  OK with me, but the submitted docs
>>> are woefully inadequate on the point.  This behavior is going to have to
>>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>>> about it :-().
>> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is
>> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the
>> patch is not going to be in 9.1.  Does this sound acceptable?
> I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
> seems far short of being committable is the documentation.

Tom/Alvaro, have the two of you hammered out who is going to finish
this one off?  I *believe* Alvaro told me on IM that he was leaving
this one for Tom.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to