On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Aidan Van Dyk <ai...@highrise.ca> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Incidentally, are you planning to revive the PostgreSQL FDW for 9.2? >>>> That would be a killer feature. > >>> Even more killer would be that it could be built/packaged as an >>> extension, and use for 9.1 too ;-) > >> +1! > > Don't hold your breath. We'll probably be making enough changes in the > FDW infrastructure (particularly planner support) that making an FDW > work on both 9.1 and 9.2 would be an exercise in frustration, if it's > even possible.
Well, so far the people who seem willing to work on such changes are not exactly thick on the ground, so I think it might be a little premature to speculate about what changes they might make when they show up. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
