Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I wasn't really proposing to get rid of it, but I do wonder if there > are some configuration parameters we could add somewhere that would > make common cases easier without making really complex things > impossible.
I think the solution to that problem is to provide a default archive command that just does the very simple thing, namely moving the WAL file to some place given as parameter. Some “local” mount point. >> Now, providing a more useful sample script is certainly reasonable. Allow me to insist here, I don't think a sample is what we need to be providing our users. I think they deserve a default production grade implementation of a very simple archive command. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers