On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Since we haven't yet come up with a reasonable way of machine-editing
>> postgresql.conf, this seems like a fairly serious objection to
>> getting
>> rid of recovery.conf.  I wonder if there's a way we can work around
>> that...
> Well, we *did* actually come up with a reasonable way, but it died under an 
> avalanche of bikeshedding and 
> "we-must-do-everything-the-way-we-always-have-done".  I refer, of course, to 
> the "configuration directory" patch, which was a fine solution, and would 
> indeed take care of the recovery.conf issues as well had we implemented it.  
> We can *still* implement it, for 9.2.

Well, I find that a fairly ugly solution to the problem, but I agree
that it is solvable, if we could get a critical mass on any some
particular solution.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to